Test quality of materials or finished products

Little of this can be handed to software today.

This happens in the physical world, so software agents do not touch it. Automation here means robotics and machinery, which is a different market from the one mapped on this site, on a much slower clock.

Key facts about this work activity
How automatableBarely automatable
Kind of workPhysical, manual and inspection work
Jobs that do it8 occupations
Tool categories that applyNone
O*NET activityInspecting Equipment, Structures, or Materials (4.A.1.b.2)

What this looks like on the job

Not our paraphrase. These are real task statements recorded against this activity, spread across the 8 occupations that perform it.

  • Finish vehicle instrumentation and deinstrumentation.
  • Test new products for flavor, texture, color, nutritional content, and adherence to government and industry standards.
  • Conduct quality control tests.
  • Test individual parts and products to ensure that manufacturer and governmental quality and safety standards are met.
  • Perform tests on seeds to evaluate seed viability.
  • Conduct standardized tests on food, beverages, additives, or preservatives to ensure compliance with standards and regulations regarding factors such as color, texture, or nutrients.
  • Conduct routine and non-routine analyses of in-process materials, raw materials, environmental samples, finished goods, or stability samples.
  • Test raw materials, processes, or finished products to determine quality or quantity of materials or characteristics of a substance.
  • Test material samples for tolerance under tension, compression, and shear to determine the cause of metal failures.
  • Measure, test, or weigh bottles, cans, or other containers to ensure that hardness, strength, or dimensions meet specifications.
  • Test metals to determine conformance to specifications of mechanical strength, strength-weight ratio, ductility, magnetic and electrical properties, and resistance to abrasion, corrosion, heat, and cold.

What we would actually use

Nothing in our landscape addresses this work. That is the honest answer rather than a padded list: this activity needs a person present, or a machine rather than a software agent.

Our pickBuy nothing

Nothing on this site applies. Automation here is robotics and machinery, a different market on a much slower clock, and no software subscription moves it.

Chosen for the cheapest thing that does the job, not the best funded. Nothing on this site is sponsored, and the full landscape is there when you want to disagree with us.

Work that goes with it

O*NET groups these under “Test characteristics of materials or products”. In practice they tend to be done by the same person, in the same sitting.

Related work activities
ActivityJobs
Test chemical or physical characteristics of materials or products16
Test characteristics of materials or structures11
Test materials, solutions, or samples10
Test products for functionality or quality9
Test fluids to identify contamination or other problems7
Analyze test results5

Method. The activity, its taxonomy placement and the occupations that perform it come straight from the public-domain O*NET 30.3 database. The automatability band is ours: we map each of O*NET’s 41 generalized work activities to how much of its output current software can produce, assuming a person still reviews and owns the result. It is a coarse three-way judgment on purpose. A precise-looking percentage here would be invented.