Test performance of electrical, electronic, mechanical, or integrated systems or equipment.
Little of this can be handed to software today.
This happens in the physical world, so software agents do not touch it. Automation here means robotics and machinery, which is a different market from the one mapped on this site, on a much slower clock.
| How automatable | Barely automatable |
|---|---|
| Kind of work | Physical, manual and inspection work |
| Jobs that do it | 30 occupations |
| Tool categories that apply | None |
| O*NET activity | Inspecting Equipment, Structures, or Materials (4.A.1.b.2) |
What could do this work.
Nothing in our landscape addresses this work. That is the honest answer rather than a padded list: this activity needs a person present, or a machine rather than a software agent.
Who does this work.
30 occupations in the O*NET database perform this activity. Each one has a full breakdown of its other tasks.
- Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologists and Technicians
- Aerospace Engineers
- Agricultural Engineers
- Automotive Engineering Technicians
- Automotive Engineers
- Boilermakers
- Calibration Technologists and Technicians
- Computer Hardware Engineers
- Disc Jockeys, Except Radio
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Electro-Mechanical and Mechatronics Technologists and Technicians
- Environmental Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Human Factors Engineers and Ergonomists
- Lighting Technicians
- Marine Engineers and Naval Architects
- Mechanical Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Mechanical Engineers
- Mechatronics Engineers
- Microsystems Engineers
- Nanosystems Engineers
- Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians
- Non-Destructive Testing Specialists
- Nuclear Engineers
- Penetration Testers
- Petroleum Engineers
- Photonics Engineers
- Photonics Technicians
- Radio Frequency Identification Device Specialists
- Robotics Engineers
- Robotics Technicians
Work that goes with it.
O*NET groups these under “Test performance of equipment or systems”. In practice they tend to be done by the same person, in the same sitting.
Method. The activity, its taxonomy placement and the occupations that perform it come straight from the public-domain O*NET 30.3 database. The automatability band is ours: we map each of O*NET’s 41 generalized work activities to how much of its output current software can produce, assuming a person still reviews and owns the result. It is a coarse three-way judgment on purpose. A precise-looking percentage here would be invented.