Monitor the productivity or efficiency of industrial operations

Little of this can be handed to software today.

This happens in the physical world, so software agents do not touch it. Automation here means robotics and machinery, which is a different market from the one mapped on this site, on a much slower clock.

Key facts about this work activity
How automatableBarely automatable
Kind of workPhysical, manual and inspection work
Jobs that do it10 occupations
Tool categories that applyNone
O*NET activityMonitoring Processes, Materials, or Surroundings (4.A.1.a.2)

What this looks like on the job

Not our paraphrase. These are real task statements recorded against this activity, spread across the 10 occupations that perform it.

  • Perform tests and monitor performance of processes throughout stages of production to determine degree of control over variables such as temperature, density, specific gravity, and pressure.
  • Collect data relating to commercial or residential development, population, or power system interconnection to determine operating efficiency of electrical systems.
  • Monitor material performance, and evaluate its deterioration.
  • Monitor mine production rates to assess operational effectiveness.
  • Monitor production rates, and plan rework processes to improve production.
  • Monitor or calibrate automated systems, industrial control systems, or system components to maximize efficiency of production.
  • Monitor and adjust production processes or equipment for quality and productivity.
  • Read dials and meters to determine amperage, voltage, electrical output and input at specific operating temperature to analyze parts performance.
  • Monitor computer-controlled test equipment, according to written or verbal instructions.
  • Develop manufacturing procedures and monitor the manufacture of their designs in a factory to improve operations and product quality.
  • Design, implement, and monitor the development of mines, facilities, systems, or equipment.

What we would actually use

Nothing in our landscape addresses this work. That is the honest answer rather than a padded list: this activity needs a person present, or a machine rather than a software agent.

Our pickBuy nothing

Nothing on this site applies. Automation here is robotics and machinery, a different market on a much slower clock, and no software subscription moves it.

Chosen for the cheapest thing that does the job, not the best funded. Nothing on this site is sponsored, and the full landscape is there when you want to disagree with us.

Method. The activity, its taxonomy placement and the occupations that perform it come straight from the public-domain O*NET 30.3 database. The automatability band is ours: we map each of O*NET’s 41 generalized work activities to how much of its output current software can produce, assuming a person still reviews and owns the result. It is a coarse three-way judgment on purpose. A precise-looking percentage here would be invented.