Inspect facilities to ensure compliance with security or safety regulations
Little of this can be handed to software today.
This happens in the physical world, so software agents do not touch it. Automation here means robotics and machinery, which is a different market from the one mapped on this site, on a much slower clock.
| How automatable | Barely automatable |
|---|---|
| Kind of work | Physical, manual and inspection work |
| Jobs that do it | 9 occupations |
| Tool categories that apply | None |
| O*NET activity | Inspecting Equipment, Structures, or Materials (4.A.1.b.2) |
What this looks like on the job
Not our paraphrase. These are real task statements recorded against this activity, spread across the 9 occupations that perform it.
- Inspect facilities, supplies, vehicles, and equipment to ensure conformance to standards.
- Inspect stations, uniforms, equipment, or recreation areas to ensure compliance with safety standards, taking corrective action as necessary.
- Patrol the premises to prevent or detect intrusion, protect property, or preserve order.
- Inspect properties that store, handle, and use hazardous materials to ensure compliance with laws, codes, and regulations, and issue hazardous materials permits to facilities found in compliance.
- Inspect camp sites to ensure that campers are in compliance with forest use regulations.
- Conduct fire, safety, and sanitation inspections.
- Examine animal licenses, and inspect establishments housing animals for compliance with laws.
- Inspect buildings, equipment, or access points to determine security risks.
- Conduct inspections of the airport property and perimeter to maintain controlled access to airfields.
What we would actually use
Nothing in our landscape addresses this work. That is the honest answer rather than a padded list: this activity needs a person present, or a machine rather than a software agent.
Nothing on this site applies. Automation here is robotics and machinery, a different market on a much slower clock, and no software subscription moves it.
Chosen for the cheapest thing that does the job, not the best funded. Nothing on this site is sponsored, and the full landscape is there when you want to disagree with us.
How people actually do it
No workflow names this activity yet, but these automate the same kind of work, with the prompts to paste and what to keep for yourself.
Who does this work
9 occupations in the O*NET database perform this activity. Each one has a full breakdown of its other tasks.
- Airfield Operations Specialists
- Animal Control Workers
- Correctional Officers and Jailers
- Fire Inspectors and Investigators
- First-Line Supervisors of Firefighting and Prevention Workers
- First-Line Supervisors of Police and Detectives
- First-Line Supervisors of Security Workers
- Forest Fire Inspectors and Prevention Specialists
- Retail Loss Prevention Specialists
Work that goes with it
O*NET groups these under “Inspect facilities or equipment”. In practice they tend to be done by the same person, in the same sitting.
Method. The activity, its taxonomy placement and the occupations that perform it come straight from the public-domain O*NET 30.3 database. The automatability band is ours: we map each of O*NET’s 41 generalized work activities to how much of its output current software can produce, assuming a person still reviews and owns the result. It is a coarse three-way judgment on purpose. A precise-looking percentage here would be invented.