Care for animals
Little of this can be handed to software today.
The documentation around care is highly automatable and that is where the time goes back. The care itself needs physical presence and someone accountable for the outcome, so this work stays where it is.
| How automatable | Barely automatable |
|---|---|
| Kind of work | Direct care and assistance |
| Jobs that do it | 6 occupations |
| Tool categories that apply | Vertical agents |
| O*NET activity | Assisting and Caring for Others (4.A.4.a.5) |
What this looks like on the job
Not our paraphrase. These are real task statements recorded against this activity, spread across the 6 occupations that perform it.
- Provide care for park program animals.
- Conduct specialized procedures, such as animal branding or tattooing or hoof trimming.
- Feed or exercise animals or provide other general care, such as cleaning or maintaining holding or performance areas.
- Feed and water animals according to schedules and feeding instructions.
- Feed and water animals, and clean and disinfect pens, cages, yards, and hutches.
- Feed and water livestock and monitor food and water supplies.
- Perform animal grooming duties, such as washing, brushing, clipping, and trimming coats, cutting nails, and cleaning ears.
- Bathe and groom animals.
- Herd livestock to pastures for grazing or to scales, trucks, or other enclosures.
- Exercise animals to maintain their physical and mental health.
- Clip or shear hair on animals.
- Shift animals between grazing areas to ensure that they have sufficient access to food.
- Find homes for stray or unwanted animals.
- Groom, clip, trim, or castrate animals, dock ears and tails, or shear coats to collect hair.
- Transfer animals between enclosures to facilitate breeding, birthing, shipping, or rearrangement of exhibits.
- Spray livestock with disinfectants and insecticides, or dip or bathe animals.
- Protect herds from predators, using trained dogs.
What we would actually use
Nothing in our landscape addresses this work. That is the honest answer rather than a padded list: this activity needs a person present, or a machine rather than a software agent.
Buy nothing for the care itself. The time comes back from the documentation around it, so the stack worth building is the recording one, on the pages for that work.
Chosen for the cheapest thing that does the job, not the best funded. Nothing on this site is sponsored, and the full landscape is there when you want to disagree with us.
The rest of the category
Context, not alternatives to weigh up. We name the layer rather than promise a named product does your specific task.
Matched from the kind of work, not from vendor marketing. Check any of them can reach the system your records actually live in — that connection, not the model, is where these projects stall.
Who does this work
6 occupations in the O*NET database perform this activity. Each one has a full breakdown of its other tasks.
Work that goes with it
O*NET groups these under “Care for plants or animals”. In practice they tend to be done by the same person, in the same sitting.
| Activity | Jobs |
|---|---|
| Provide care for animals | 4 |
| Care for plants or animals | 3 |
| Perform animal breeding procedures | 3 |
Method. The activity, its taxonomy placement and the occupations that perform it come straight from the public-domain O*NET 30.3 database. The automatability band is ours: we map each of O*NET’s 41 generalized work activities to how much of its output current software can produce, assuming a person still reviews and owns the result. It is a coarse three-way judgment on purpose. A precise-looking percentage here would be invented.